Gen X are the revolutionaries (and the NYT coverage of shared care stinks)

Gen X are the revolutionaries (and the NYT coverage of shared care stinks) How ironic that right after I post about dangers of Mommy Porn, the New York Times exacerbates this problem to include men. Take a look at the insipid photo that illustrates the article about shared care by Lisa Belkin. But first, a disclaimer: I know Lisa, shes super nice and fun, and she talked with me about how I could be the person in the article who is the train wreck example of shared care. A second disclaimer is that Amy and Marc, featured there as the poster children for shared care, are also people Ive helpedabout how to pitch themselves to the media so they could get some articles written about themselves and get a book deal. And they, too, were nice. So its ironic that I am going to bitch about them now. Specifically, Im going to tell you why I wanted to rip all their heads off when I read that piece about shared care. 1. Shared care shields people from the reality that their careers are not great. Its rare that shared care works long-term for someone who is very good in the business world. Some people are great at management, some people are born leaders. These are people who catapult up to the top of the business world, in whatever sector they are in. And they love their work. These are not the people who do shared care. It is simply not appealing in the long run to the best workplace leaders. The people who think they want to try this usually end up frustrated after downsizing their career for shared care. Read closely and youll see examples of this in the article. In fact, there is not an example of someone who is competing at the very top of their field who ended up enjoying shared care. 2. You need a lot of money to do shared care. With one stay at home parent, you only need one parent to pull in a ton of money. With shared care parenting, you need two people who can make miracles happen in their chosen profession; two people who are so clever and specialized that they can figure out what to do for work that is part-time. Already, this is a big feat since the Washington Post reports that most women who stay at home full-time would rather work part-time but they cant find the jobs. But you also need people who have salaries high enough so that if you made both the salaries part-time, the family could still not only survive, but actually grow and still be financially okay. Look, I know that usually when the topic is money and people are saying they dont have enough to do what they want with their lives, I am a hard-ass and I tell them to move to a place with a lower cost of living. But I cant help noticing that most people who make shared care work have their families helping them, which means they have to stay in the vicinity of family and do not have the ability to move to more economical locations. 3. Shared care kills two careers. I am about to support this claim with very sloppy research from people I have met. But this seems okay because the New York Times is announcing a major trend based on interviews with what appears to be about ten couples. So based on my own research of about ten couples who did shared care and hated it, everyones career takes a huge hit. Dylan Tweney, editor at Wired.com, told me that his career definitely took a hit from doing shared care with his wife and daughter for two years. He freelanced, and he points out that you cannot grow a business if you are working four hours a day. You have to always be earning money, so you cant afford to take time to expand your markets. 4. Shared care requires an unlikely match of personalities in a marriage. Newsflash: Not everyone has the personality to stay home with kids. There are some people who get their energy from leading. Those people need a team to lead. There are some people who are caregivers. They are energized by meeting peoples personal needs. In fact, pairing those two types makes great couples. Corporate life is designed up for leaders to thrive, and leadersyes, provendo better when they have a caregiver type at home, taking care of their personal life. Heres some more news: Its unlikely that two caretakers would marry each other. They just dont. They are not attracted to each other. I have not much to prove this except that I am conscious in the world. And so are you, so you know this intuitively. And this means that marriages are not generally optimized to work for two people who both want to stay home with their kids. 5. Shared care caters only to detail-oriented types. Shared care might actually be the most inefficient division of labor in the history of humanity. With one stay-at-home parent, he or she maintains a schedule, checks in with no one, and announces to the work-at-the-office parent what will be happening at home. With shared care, the schedules are insane. When Tweney talks about the intricate schedules he and his wife hadthat actually required the help of neighbors because they didnt have family nearhe says, Its definitely more efficient to have one person in charge. There is a lot of overhead to managing shared care. And this is a theme even with the people in Belkins article who love shared care. For some peoplevisionaries, big-picture thinkers, leadersmanaging the details of a shared care schedule would be mind-numbing and soul-crushing. The fundamental problem with Belkin declaring a revolution in parenthood today is that the revolution is in a demographic she is not a part of. Its like the New York Times covering the blogosphere. They dont get it, so they focus on the craziness instead of the mainstream. But the real trend that we really have here is that Generation X puts parenting before anything elseeven men. Gen X is horrified by the self-centered parenting that they received. And Gen X is an inherently revolutionary generation. We have little to lose: We are the first generation in American history to earn less than our parents. We are a generation largely berated and misunderstood by the media, so we have no great image to protect, and we have been handed nothing on a silver platter, so we have nothing to squander. The history of the revolutionsFrench, American, Russianis the history of people with nothing to lose recognizing the need for change. Generation X is that group today. And shared care is just one, small way that Gen X is expressing their revolutionary nature: with their parenting.